Systematic review and meta-analysis: protocol, search, screening, extraction, synthesis
A systematic review answers a question from all the studies that meet criteria fixed in advance; a meta-analysis pools their effects. Read by the protocol designer, the study screener, the study extractor and the review writer of the `systematic-review` template, and by the reviewers. The template follows the PRISMA 2020 statement (Page et al. 2021, `page2021prisma`).
Where it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: exampleBy e2er authors
How studies reach it
Disciplines it reaches
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who authored what. 1 study in total.
Provenance
- Project
- e2er bundled skills
- Maintained by
- e2er authors
- Licence
- MIT
- Source file
- bhanneke/E2ER-project/blob/v0.16.1/skills/files/methods/meta-analysis.md
- Identifier
- e2er/methods/meta-analysis
Use it
Ships with every installation of e2er.
Description
Data model- Discipline
- Economics
- Method family
- Literature review
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- not specified
- Authors
- e2er authors (Software, Methodology)
- Usage
- used in 1 template · loaded by 4 specialists · Examples: 1 example study
- Source
- e2er repository · skills/files · @d8fd8ab
- Record
- skill:e2er/methods/meta-analysis · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.
More
methodsMIT
Evaluations
PlannedNo evaluation record yet. An evaluation shows where a skill breaks before others rely on it.
Evaluate this skillMore methods skills in e2er bundled skills
On e2er.org
Loading…
Discussion
Loading…