Skip to content
Published studies are shown for demonstration purposes, not because they are good or bad research. Demonstrator · items marked Example are invented · what exists today
Search

Specialists · Review panel

Review of the methods

e2er gives this specialist no role sentence of its own. It shares the generated specialist prompt and is defined by its skills and the artifact it must write.

No evaluations yet
Technical details

Specialist id methods_reviewer (as e2er's code, the run's log and the dossier name it); template steps descriptive-study · review, policy-evaluation · review, spatial-analysis · review, systematic-review · review, text-analysis · review, time-series-forecasting · review.

Description

Data model
Discipline
Economics
Method family
Review
Design
not specified
Research stage
Review
Authors
e2er authors (Software, Methodology)
Usage
used in 6 templates · Examples: 1 example study
Source
e2er repository · src/core/specialists/registry.py · @d8fd8ab
Record
agent:methods_reviewer · JSON

Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.

More

Defined in code; specialists as files planned

Evaluations

No evaluation record yet.

Evaluate this specialist Report a failure
Cite this specialist
Persistent identifiers planned
@software{e2erauthors2026e2erspecialistreviewofth,
  title   = {e2er specialist: Review of the methods},
  author  = {e2er authors},
  year    = {2026},
  note    = {e2er specialist. Persistent identifier planned},
  url     = {https://e2er.org/specialists/methods_reviewer}
}

On e2er.org

Loading…

Discussion

Loading…