Specialists · Review panel
Review of domain plausibility
e2er gives this specialist no role sentence of its own. It shares the generated specialist prompt and is defined by its skills and the artifact it must write.
No evaluations yetWhere it sits
left: what it builds on · right: what builds on it · pale: exampleBy e2er authors
How studies reach it
Disciplines it reaches
Solid: published studies. Light: examples.
Computed from the records on this site: what each study, template and specialist names as used, which study extends which, and who authored what. 1 study in total.
Output contract
The run checks that this specialist wrote the artifact below. Under the full governance regime a missing artifact fails the step.
review_plausibility.md
Skills it loads
Technical details
Specialist id plausibility_reviewer (as e2er's code, the run's log and the dossier name it); template steps descriptive-study · review, spatial-analysis · review, systematic-review · review, text-analysis · review, time-series-forecasting · review.
Description
Data model- Discipline
- Economics
- Method family
- Review
- Design
- not specified
- Research stage
- Review
- Authors
- e2er authors (Software, Methodology)
- Usage
- used in 5 templates · Examples: 1 example study
- Source
- e2er repository · src/core/specialists/registry.py · @d8fd8ab
- Record
- agent:plausibility_reviewer · JSON
Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.
More
Defined in code; specialists as files planned
On e2er.org
Loading…
Discussion
Loading…