Skip to content
Published studies are shown for demonstration purposes, not because they are good or bad research. Demonstrator · items marked Example are invented · what exists today
Search

Skills · e2er bundled skills

Technical Review

This skill describes how to conduct a technical/methodological review of a research paper, focusing on the internal coherence of the data-to-results pipeline. Unlike a referee report (which evaluates contribution and positioning), the technical review asks: does the implementation actually do what the paper claims it does?

In the catalogue
No evaluations yet
Anyone can contribute. Improve this skill Contribute a skill

Provenance

Project
e2er bundled skills
Maintained by
e2er authors
Licence
MIT
Source file
bhanneke/E2ER-project/blob/v0.16.1/skills/files/review/technical-review.md
Identifier
e2er/review/technical-review

Use it

Ships with every installation of e2er.

Cite this skill
Persistent identifiers planned
@software{e2erauthors2026technicalreview,
  title   = {Technical Review},
  author  = {e2er authors},
  year    = {2026},
  note    = {e2er skill. Persistent identifier planned},
  url     = {https://github.com/bhanneke/E2ER-project/blob/v0.16.1/skills/files/review/technical-review.md}
}
Report a failure

Description

Data model
Discipline
Economics
Method family
not specified
Design
not specified
Research stage
Review
Authors
e2er authors (Software, Methodology)
Usage
used in 9 templates · 1 published study · loaded by 2 specialists · Examples: 8 example studies
Source
e2er repository · skills/files · @d8fd8ab
Record
skill:e2er/review/technical-review · JSON

Solid tags are declared by the source or mapped from its terms; dashed tags are inferred by a published rule. Hover a tag for its provenance.

More

reviewMIT

Evaluations

Planned

No evaluation record yet. An evaluation shows where a skill breaks before others rely on it.

Evaluate this skill

More review skills in e2er bundled skills

On e2er.org

Loading…

Discussion

Loading…